Rights :: essays research papers

One would think that the story of Matthew Shepard would bring raft together over a tragic event. On the contrary, Matthew Shepards finale examinemed to pick off the nation apart, due to passels conflicting points of view. Should Matthews flagitious death be seen as any other killing, or should everyone pull away it upon himself or herself to be responsible for what happened to Matthew? When reading the article Blood on our Hands, I study that the writer had a strong speckle astir(predicate) his argument. Phil Martin states that everyone should realise responsibility for Matthews death be pull in people over reject the unfamiliar and label others without thinking nearly the consequences of their actions. I believe that he is correct that we in the United States do not take the time to under jut people who are different than we are. Being in a minority group as a young Judaic woman, I can empathize with the writer when he talks about being angry with self-sanctimonious religious leaders. When religious officials speak out about gays, Jews, Muslims or any other minority they need to realize that people may take their words and apply them. How can anyone be shock about the death of a gay man, when it is being taught that gay people are not deserving of God?Nobodys cause is more important than anyone elses. Everyone should educate themselves about the differences we face in America. catch is the key component to making change happen. If gay activists stood for the equality of women, and if women activists would stand for the equality of African Americans, then everyone would stand for something. They would stand for the equality of alone Americans in this country.The problem with this theory of mine is that people automatically put together the blame on others and points the finger the other way. In Matthew Shepard What is the Big raft? Colby Carter uses personal attacks at gays to bolster his opinion. He states that protestors at a homophile Ma rch in New York waved signs reading, Where is your rage? in response to the death of Matthew. I think the writer takes the word rage out of condition because he insists that gay protestors were using violence to solve the problem. I see people waving signs that display the same message outside of miscarriage clinics. Anyone can be angry about something they believe in powerfully without having someone jumping to the conclusion that they are violent.