We Googled You

We Googled You The case in the We Googled You article is rather tricky. On one hand, the disconcerting online revelation with Mimi protesting against china serves as solid bear witness not to utilize her. If members of the management team based in chinaware discover the pictures and randomness about Mimis protests, they may decline to come about to conduct business with Hathaway Jones. It pull up stakes also ruin the companys reputation in the eyes of potential future customers. In gain to the searched Google results, Mimis recommendations also contained a few negative traits including brash and potently opinionated.These aspects may not allow her to get along with other workers and colleagues. Her free behavior including her wink at Fred is not quite suitable for Chinas more conservative culture. On the other hand, it is possible that Virginia misconstrue the information she found online. Fred should consult Mimi directly to fully understand the line about what really hap pened. It is extremely easy for someone to falsify information and manipulate digital media. With digital cameras being so prominent today, it is required that personal pictures and information would end up online for everyone to Google and find out.Additionally, Mimis priming includes a strong education and solid experience. Her Berkeley and Stanford degrees and past job positions will allow her to perform the job at a higher take of expertise than many other potential job applicants. As discussed in class, employers should hire based on ability to perform and not on hard data and statistics. From these standpoints, the benefits to hiring outweigh the costs. For these reasons, I support the decision to hire Mimi. I feel that she would make an excellent addition and make a great deal of contributions to Hathaway Jones.