Heideggers Critique of Cartesianism Essays -- Philosophy Papers

Heidegger is one of the few Western thinkers to have succeeded in button beyond the Western philosophic usance. Because his radical criticism is believed to have fractured the foundations of neo philosophy, his thinking is usually at the center of the controversy between the defenders of the tradition and those who wish to break with it and start afresh. In the heat of this debate, the question of Heideggers set up in relation to that tradition in general and to Cartesianism in particular has been neglected. I wish to address the question by focusing on the major aspects of Heideggers critique of Cartesian philosophy and the modern tradition. I get out first show that the strength of his criticism lies in its all-encompassing incursion of the foundations of modern philosophy, running through both the ontological and epistemological channels. Ontologically, Heidegger presents a critique of subjectivism epistemologically, he discredits the correspondence conception of truth and its underlying ocular metaphor. I will then look at his view of annals and the meaning of his concept of overcoming in order to show that his aim is not to destroy the tradition, but to provide a wider origination for it by rescuing bury elements imbedded in the tradition itself. Finally, I will show that in this attend of overcoming, Heidegger did not really depart from the tradition, but absorbed some of its prefatory tenets, as his concept of death echoes major elements of Cartesian doubt. 1. The Critique of Subjectivism matchless of the major features of Heideggers thinking is his criticism of Cartesian subjectivity. According to Heidegger, in regarding the self cogito as the guarantor of its own continuing existence and as the basis of all things... ...d Basil Blackwell, 1980) Abbau can be find Heideggers Basic Problems of Phenomenology (Bloomington inch University Press, 1982) Verbindung is discussed mainly in The Principle of Identity, in Identity and Difference (New York harpist and Row, 1969, pp. 23-41) for Uberwindung see Heideggers Nietzsche.(4) Nietzsche, vol. 4 p. 97. See Aristotles words that which is called a substance close strictly, primarily, and most of all, is that which is neither said of a subject nor in a subject, e.g., the individual man or the individual horse. (Aristotles Categories, 2a 11-13).(5) Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology p.111.(6) Heidegger M., Discourse on Thinking New York Harper and Row, 1966, p. 7.(7) Nietzsche, vol. 4, p. 106.(8) Heidegger, M. History of the Concept of Time, Bloomington Indiana University Press, 1992, pp. 316-317.