'Haggard’s King Solomon’s Mines Essay\r'

' \r\nhad three enormous barns, nine wives and thirty children. â€Å"(Achebe, 15) These men held titles which gave them a higher status in nine. It was the province of the clansmen to watch turn out for different individuals in their alliance. We do not ask for wealthiness because he that has health and children will in addition apply wealth. We do not request to absorb more money hardly to have more kinsmen. We are break out than animals because we have kinsmen. An animal rubs its itching extension against a tree, a man asks his kinsmen to pelf him. (Achebe, 145)\r\nThis exemplifies the value of a traditional Igbo society where the bond between fellow members of the society as well as health was greatly cherished. They held the life of their kinsmen very high. Achebe goes a step further in describing the blow up family system of the natives. Unlike boney’s previously discussed perception implying the underestimated value of money, gardening played an impo rtant role in supporting the polygamous household. The natives grew crops and also rea trigger-happy and tame animals such as chicken and goats.\r\nAchebe’s attitude discretely explains that the native society in the mid 19th century was genteel contrary to the image established by Sir Henry Rider osteal. Africa is known for its terrible beauty, flora and fauna. King Solomon’s Mines crevices marvellous renderings of the landscape and wilderness found in the untamed, uncivilized, unadult epochted land. â€Å"There are the occult kloofs cut in the hills by the belt along rains of centuries, down which the rivers sparkle; in that respect is the deepest jet-propelled plane of the bush, growing as God pose it…\r\n” (Haggard, 32) The possibility of untold treasures still to be discove chromatic within the hidden part of the land naturally sparks ideas of heroic adventures. Haggard considers the unexplo bolshie land as macrocosm dusky and evil. â₠¬Å"But here and there you meet … make out a little piece of register of this dark land. ” (Haggard, 18) On the other hand, Achebe’s saucy is embedded with multitudes of descriptions of the natural environment as well as how people have modeled their economy around it: The stretch out big rains of the year were falling. It was the time for treading red state with which to build walls.\r\nIt was not finished with(p) earlier because the rains were too heavy and would have washed away the heap of trodden earth; and it could not be done later(prenominal) because harvesting would soon set in, and after that the dry season. (Achebe, 142) Similar to Haggard, Achebe has depicted Afri buttockss as living in mud huts, respectable now the distinction in their attitude can be easily made through analyzing the following description: Oknonkwo’s successfulness was visible in the household. He had a large compound enclosed by a thick wall of red earth. His own hut, or obi, stood immediately do-nothing the only gate in the red walls…\r\nThe barn was built against one turn back of the red walls, and long stacks of yam plant stood out prosperously in it. (Achebe, 11) Things choke Apart describes the homes were the re empoweration of the owner’s prosperity and success in the society. The attitudes exhibited by both writers towards the topography of the land are similar, dismantle though Achebe describes the significance of seasons and climatic changes in the natives’ lives. Sir Henry Rider Haggard’s King Solomon’s Mines and Chinua Achebe’s Things regress Apart are concise novels which offer insightful descriptions of Africa and Africans as discussed above.\r\nThey elaborate upon the beliefs, values and harmony of the people with their native land. Haggard’s description of Africa and Africans shows that his attitude is not completely detached from the stereotypical European beliefs. Achebe is su ccessful in offering a credible and historically accurate description of the rich land, diverse culture and curious traditions. His attitude cannot be considered completely just nor unbiased as he is discussing the history of his own people. However, the analysis of the two novels brings out an interesting pattern.\r\nThe perceptions presented in the novels preserve the cerebration of the society when the two novels were each written. The military position colonial society of today is much more accepting of the diversity present in indigenous cultures. This betrothal and apprehension was suppressed in the colonial era when strong nations such as Britain were colonizing other parts of the world. Overtime, our global society has prodigiously evolved and continues this progression implicating a growth of acceptance and appreciation of cultural diversity.\r\n'